Processing...

`theta_t = sin^(-1)((1)/(n_2) sin( theta_i ))`

Enter a value for all fields

This Hemicylinder Optics Lab is a free online lab simulation of the Laws of Reflection and Refraction. If you're just learning about reflection and refraction, you might want to skim this page (the calculator might be useful as well). If you have the opportunity to perform this experiment live, then you probably won't need this simulator. However, optical equipment is notoriously finicky, and it's not often cheap. This lab simulation can be used by anyone (you're welcome to; please do), but will likely be most useful to classes that don't have enough time or equipment for a full-blown optics lab.

*Top-down view of the lab setup* For this experiment, you would need a laser and a plastic hemicylinder. The laser emits a beam of light that takes the path shown in the picture. The laser strikes the hemicylinder in the middle of its flat side. The picture is a top-down view, so it looks like the hemicylinder is a semi-circle. The hemicylinder is a three-dimensional shape, so it does have a thickness. However, we can ignore that thickness as long as the laser and hemicylinder are level (which they are, for this experiment).

Snell's Law (the Law of Refraction) is `n_1 sin(theta_i) = n_2 sin(theta_t)`. If we rearrange this equation to solve for `theta_t`, we get that `theta_t = sin^(-1) (n_1/n_2 sin(theta_i))`. This experiment assumes that the beam of light is going from air into the plastic hemicylinder. The index of refraction of air (`n_(air)`) is very close to 1, so we can just substitute 1 in for `n_1` and we achieve the above equation: `theta_t = sin^(-1) (1/n_2 sin(theta_i))`

Simply enter the incident angle and select whether you'd like your answer in degrees or radians (degrees is the default). The equation only shows the formula for `theta_t` because it's the most complex. For more information regarding the law of reflection, you can look at this page.

You might notice that if you enter, say, 15 degrees twice, you'll get two different answers. This equation has some "experimental noise" built into it. In a real lab, your results will be different from what's theoretically expected. That's not because the theory is necessarily wrong, but rather because we can't run a perfect experiment. To try and cut through the experimental noise, scientists generally use large data sets and statistics. In a more casual lab, such as this one, the "statistical analysis" is just an average of a handful of data points. Is it perfectly rigorous? No. But hopefully it gets you used to how scientific experiments work.

For this lab, I recommend using a table like the following:

`theta_i` | `theta_r` | `theta_t` | `n_2` |
---|---|---|---|

0° | |||

15° | |||

30° | |||

45° | |||

60° | |||

75° | |||

90° |

This is just a suggestion. You may use more or different incident angles if you wish (I would caution against using fewer incident angles since fewer data points generally means an experiment is less accurate). You may also measure the angles in radians, if you wish.

Estimating n_{2}

The index of refraction of air is (very close to) 1, but what about the index of refraction of this plastic hemicylinder? The equation at the top of this page doesn't show you what the value is for `n_2`, but it is built into the code for this page. You're going to try and estimate the value of `n_2` by using the relationship between the incident angle and transmitted angle. We know that `n_1 sin(theta_i) = n_2 sin(theta_t)`. We also know `n_1`, and we have many pairs of incident and transmitted angles. This will allow us to solve for many approximate values of `n_2`. If the math is giving you trouble, try this calculator/ (Note: `theta_i = 0` won't help us find `n_2` since normal incidence results in `theta_t = 0` no matter what `n_2` is.)

Once you have your approximate values of `n_2`, average them. Below your table (or whatever you're using to keep track of the data), write "Average experimental value of `n_2`: " and then the average.

In a laboratory setting, we can't easily examine the light while it's still inside the hemicylinder. Instead, we must wait for the light to leave the hemicylinder and strike a surface before we can tell where it is. With that in mind, why did we choose a hemicylinder instead of a cube, sphere, or random blob? Give your best guess. Hint: it's very important that the laser strikes the middle of the hemicylinder's flat side.

This lab simulation's error is artificially built in, but live experiments have reasons for error. Imagine that you're actually performing this experiment. You have your laser and hemicylinder set up. You send the light into the hemicylinder, and then measure the angles of reflection and refraction. You repeat this for a variety of incident angles. What are two potential sources of error that would result in your answers being different from what's theoretically expected?

This lab simulation is based on an actual lab exercise from Professor Charles Adler at St. Mary's College of Maryland.